Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replication websocket bug with composite primary key #6141

Open
sir-script opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

replication websocket bug with composite primary key #6141

sir-script opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@sir-script
Copy link

Hello everyone,

I am encountering different behaviors when streaming the replication.
In the first case (simple primary key), the user who modifies the document receives a subscribe event.
In the second case, where a composite primary key is used, the user who modifies the document does not receive a subscribe event. All other users/tabs receive the event.
Couldn't find the exact source code lines where the difference occurs while debugging.
The logic behind both cases is the same. I have checked this thoroughly and am quite sure that it is due to the primary key.
Does anyone have any idea or hint on what could be causing this?

Pseudo Code:

const replicationState = replicateGraphQL();
...
replication.received$.subscribe(() =>
  console.log('fired'),
);

Case 1:

servicePlan (primary key with a single field)

export const servicePlanSchema = {
  version: 5,
  primaryKey: 'sp_id',
  type: 'object',
  properties: {
    sp_id: {
      type: 'string',
      maxLength: 20,
    },
    description: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    resort_id: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    status_id: {
      type: 'integer',
    },
    owner_id: {
      type: 'integer',
    },
    ts_completed: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    ts_assigned: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    ts_updated: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    sort_id: {
      type: 'integer',
    },
    ts_inserted: {
      type: 'string',
    },
  },
  required: ['sp_id', 'resort_id', 'ts_updated', 'ts_inserted', 'sort_id'],
};

Server Response:

{
  "id": "c98447b0-78c9-4ebb-9c0c-d5558c2c98c0",
  "type": "next",
  "payload": {
    "data": {
      "streamServicePlan": {
        "checkpoint": {
          "sp_id": "CHECKLIST_XXX_AM",
          "ts_updated": "2024-06-24T11:53:32.194Z",
          "sort_id": 64
        },
        "documents": [
          {
            "deleted": false,
            "sp_id": "CHECKLIST_XXX_AM",
            "description": "test plan",
            "resort_id": "8bbf66d8-d894-47df-a12e-c00f4c1f0e60",
            "status_id": 0,
            "owner_id": 15,
            "ts_assigned": "2024-06-24T11:53:32.194Z",
            "ts_completed": null,
            "ts_updated": "2024-06-24T11:53:32.194Z",
            "ts_inserted": "2024-05-15T13:52:57.130Z",
            "sort_id": 64
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}

Result: Subscribe event for the user who changed the document.

Case 2:

serviceObject (composite primary key)

export const serviceObjectSchema = {
  version: 3,
  primaryKey: {
    key: 'id',
    fields: ['sp_id', 'so_id'],
    separator: '|',
  },
  type: 'object',
  properties: {
    id: {
      type: 'string',
      maxLength: 40,
    },
    sp_id: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    so_id: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    name: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    description: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    type_id: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    type_name: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    master_so_id: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    status_id: {
      type: 'integer',
    },
    serial_number: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    latitude: {
      type: 'float',
    },
    longitude: {
      type: 'float',
    },
    track_name: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    position_number: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    machine_room_name: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    img_dev: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    img_mnt: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    ts_completed: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    ts_updated: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    ts_inserted: {
      type: 'string',
    },
    sort_id: {
      type: 'integer',
    },
  },
  required: [
    'sp_id',
    'so_id',
    'name',
    'ts_updated',
    'sort_id',
    'ts_inserted',
    'description',
    'master_so_id',
  ],
};

Server Response:

{
  "id": "02a021b5-c780-40f6-98ac-95189e69aaee",
  "type": "next",
  "payload": {
    "data": {
      "streamServiceObject": {
        "checkpoint": {
          "sp_id": "CHECKLIST_XXX_AM",
          "so_id": "SO-00000012-XX",
          "ts_updated": "2024-06-24T11:58:56.890Z",
          "sort_id": 877
        },
        "documents": [
          {
            "deleted": false,
            "description": "",
            "img_dev": "GUImage_tr10",
            "img_mnt": "GUMount_mobile",
            "latitude": null,
            "longitude": null,
            "machine_room_name": null,
            "master_so_id": "SO-00000012-XX",
            "name": "GU00X",
            "position_number": "998",
            "serial_number": "123-456-67811",
            "so_id": "SO-00000012-XX",
            "sort_id": 877,
            "sp_id": "CHECKLIST_XXX_AM",
            "status_id": 1,
            "track_name": "Test track",
            "ts_completed": "2024-06-24T11:58:56.890Z",
            "ts_updated": "2024-06-24T11:58:56.890Z",
            "type_id": "FANMACHINE",
            "type_name": "TR10",
            "ts_inserted": "2024-05-15T15:47:15.103Z"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}

Result: No subscribe event for the user who changed the document.

Technical Details:

Rxdb (15.12.0)
Storage: Dexie
replicateGraphQL

@pubkey
Copy link
Owner

pubkey commented Jun 26, 2024

Can you make a PR with a test case to reproduce that?
But very likely this is your server behaving different.

Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 3, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed soon. Please update it or it may be closed to keep our repository organized. The best way is to add some more information or make a pull request with a test case. Also you might get help in fixing it at the RxDB Community Chat If you know you will continue working on this, just write any message to the issue (like "ping") to remove the stale tag.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 3, 2024
@sir-script
Copy link
Author

@pubkey Ok, thanks for the information. So, you are not aware of a similar case?
I will try to create a minimal example in the coming weeks to make it easier to reproduce.
However, this is unfortunately a bit more complex than usual because I cannot pinpoint it exactly, and Replication, Websockets and backend logic are involved.
Thanks anyway.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants